Thursday, October 23, 2008

For my film oriented outside reading, i chose to read a film reviw by ReelViews of The Strangers. The article itself, written by James Berardinelli says that he thought the film "doesn't break any new ground on a plot level, but its interesting cinematography suffuses the production with an overpowering combination of paranoia and claustrophobia. This is one of those rare horror movies that concentrates on suspense and terror rather than on gore and a high body count. By keeping the premise simple and making the small group of characters seem like genuine human beings, Bertino sets the audience up for a tense and uneasy 85 minutes." James also noted that because the producer used every shot to keep the intensity level up and used noises to his advantage, it was one of those movies where if you see it, and you go home and the power is out, you will look for every excuse not to go inside. Its interesting how he brings about the topic of how choosing the right actors make all the difference. "They take the material seriously, and that's enough." James closes the review by saying who would enjoy the movie plot and twists and turns by adding that "It's intense but not necessarily fun and may disappoint less sophisticated horror fans. However, for die-hard supporters of unsettling peeks into the dark side of human nature, this is a welcome excursion."

2 comments:

Spenser W said...

Strangers looked completely creepy in the trailer and I'm glad to hear it fufilled those expectations. I went to go get my hair cut last week (Like really?) and she was telling me about the movie. She told me that she stayed at a friends house that night because she was so freaked out. I'm a complete chicken and would never even dream of seeing this movie but it seems like for any real horror movie fan, this would be a movie to see. Good job putting in quotes from a reviewer. It makes it sound legit.

Michael A. said...

Its funny how movie critics can be so different. I remember reading a review of this movie when it came out, and the critic seemed very dissapointed. Unlike this critic, the one who wrote the article I read thought the actors were wrong for the movie, and that it was a very prediclable movie. They did agree on the face that the plot wasnt anything special, though.

It seems as though in this post, you are just reading the important bits of the review to us, not explaining what you think about the review and the critic. Try to put more of your own thoughts into the writing.